Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
PLoS One ; 16(5): e0251872, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1234592

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: As the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic accelerates, the supply of personal protective equipment remains under strain. To combat shortages, re-use of surgical masks and filtering facepiece respirators has been recommended. Prior decontamination is paramount to the re-use of these typically single-use only items and, without compromising their integrity, must guarantee inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 and other contaminating pathogens. AIM: We provide information on the effect of time-dependent passive decontamination (infectivity loss over time during room temperature storage in a breathable bag) and evaluate inactivation of a SARS-CoV-2 surrogate and a non-enveloped model virus as well as mask and respirator integrity following active multiple-cycle vaporised hydrogen peroxide (VHP), ultraviolet germicidal irradiation (UVGI), and dry heat (DH) decontamination. METHODS: Masks and respirators, inoculated with infectious porcine respiratory coronavirus or murine norovirus, were submitted to passive decontamination or single or multiple active decontamination cycles; viruses were recovered from sample materials and viral titres were measured via TCID50 assay. In parallel, filtration efficiency tests and breathability tests were performed according to EN standard 14683 and NIOSH regulations. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Infectious porcine respiratory coronavirus and murine norovirus remained detectable on masks and respirators up to five and seven days of passive decontamination. Single and multiple cycles of VHP-, UVGI-, and DH were shown to not adversely affect bacterial filtration efficiency of masks. Single- and multiple UVGI did not adversely affect respirator filtration efficiency, while VHP and DH induced a decrease in filtration efficiency after one or three decontamination cycles. Multiple cycles of VHP-, UVGI-, and DH slightly decreased airflow resistance of masks but did not adversely affect respirator breathability. VHP and UVGI efficiently inactivated both viruses after five, DH after three, decontamination cycles, permitting demonstration of a loss of infectivity by more than three orders of magnitude. This multi-disciplinal approach provides important information on how often a given PPE item may be safely reused.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/metabolism , Decontamination/methods , Hydrogen Peroxide/pharmacology , Norovirus/drug effects , Personal Protective Equipment/supply & distribution , SARS-CoV-2/drug effects , Anti-Infective Agents/pharmacology , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/virology , Equipment Reuse , Hot Temperature , Humans , Masks/microbiology , Norovirus/isolation & purification , Pandemics , Personal Protective Equipment/microbiology , Respiratory Protective Devices/microbiology , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Ultraviolet Rays , Ultraviolet Therapy , Ventilators, Mechanical/microbiology , Volatilization
2.
PLoS One ; 16(1): e0243554, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1067394

ABSTRACT

With COVID-19 N95 shortages, frontline medical personnel are forced to reuse this disposable-but sophisticated-multilayer respirator. Widely used to decontaminate nonporous surfaces, UV-C light has demonstrated germicidal efficacy on porous, non-planar N95 respirators when all surfaces receive ≥1.0 J/cm2 dose. Of utmost importance across disciplines, translation of empirical evidence to implementation relies upon UV-C measurements frequently confounded by radiometer complexities. To enable rigorous on-respirator measurements, we introduce a photochromic indicator dose quantification technique for: (1) UV-C treatment design and (2) in-process UV-C dose validation. While addressing outstanding indicator limitations of qualitative readout and insufficient dynamic range, our methodology establishes that color-changing dosimetry can achieve the necessary accuracy (>90%), uncertainty (<10%), and UV-C specificity (>95%) required for UV-C dose measurements. In a measurement infeasible with radiometers, we observe a striking ~20× dose variation over N95s within one decontamination system. Furthermore, we adapt consumer electronics for accessible quantitative readout and use optical attenuators to extend indicator dynamic range >10× to quantify doses relevant for N95 decontamination. By transforming photochromic indicators into quantitative dosimeters, we illuminate critical considerations for both photochromic indicators themselves and UV-C decontamination processes.


Subject(s)
Decontamination/methods , N95 Respirators/microbiology , Respiratory Protective Devices/microbiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation , Equipment Contamination/prevention & control , Equipment Contamination/statistics & numerical data , Equipment Reuse/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Indicators and Reagents/radiation effects , Radiometry/methods , SARS-CoV-2/pathogenicity , Sensitivity and Specificity , Ultraviolet Rays , Ventilators, Mechanical/microbiology
3.
ACS Nano ; 14(10): 13161-13171, 2020 10 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-798108

ABSTRACT

The regeneration of filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) is of critical importance because of the severe shortage of FFRs during large-scale outbreaks of respiratory epidemics, such as COVID-19. Comprehensive experiments regarding FFR regeneration were performed in this study with model bacteria to illustrate the decontamination performance of the regeneration processes. The results showed that it is dangerous to use a contaminated FFR without any microbe inactivation treatment because the bacteria can live for more than 8 h. The filtration efficiency and surface electrostatic potential of 75% ethanol-treated FFRs were significantly reduced, and a most penetrating particle size of 200 nm was observed. Steam and microwave irradiation (MWI) showed promising decontamination performances, achieving 100% inactivation in 90 and 30 min, respectively. The filtration efficiencies of steam-treated FFRs for 50 and 100 nm particles decreased from 98.86% and 99.51% to 97.58% and 98.79%, respectively. Ultraviolet irradiation (UVI) effectively inactivated the surface bacteria with a short treatment of 5 min and did not affect the filtration performance. However, the UV dose reaching different layers of the FFP2 mask sample gradually decreased from the outermost layer to the innermost layer, while the model bacteria on the second and third layers could not be killed completely. UVI+MWI and steam were recommended to effectively decontaminate the used respirators and still maintain the respirators' filtration efficiency. The present work provides a comprehensive evaluation for FFR regeneration in terms of the filtration efficiencies for 50-500 nm particles, the electrostatic properties, mechanical properties, and decontamination effects.


Subject(s)
Bacteria/radiation effects , Disinfection/methods , Masks/microbiology , Respiratory Protective Devices/microbiology , Bacteria/drug effects , Bacteria/pathogenicity , Disinfection/standards , Ethanol/toxicity , Filtration , Humans , Masks/standards , Microwaves , Respiratory Protective Devices/standards , Steam , Textiles/microbiology , Textiles/standards , Ultraviolet Rays
4.
Am J Infect Control ; 48(12): 1543-1545, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-653329

ABSTRACT

Many healthcare systems have been forced to outsource simple mask production due to international shortages caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Providence created simple masks using surgical wrap and submitted samples to an environmental lab for bacterial filtration efficiency testing. Bacterial filtration efficiency rates ranged from 83.0% to 98.1% depending on specific material and ply, and particular filtration efficiency rates ranged from 92.3% to 97.7%. Based on mask configuration, specific surgical wrap selected, and ply, the recommended filtration efficiency for isolation and surgical masks of 95% and 98%, respectively can be achieved. These alternative masks can allow for similar coverage and safety when hospital-grade isolation masks are in short supply.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Equipment Safety/statistics & numerical data , Filtration/instrumentation , Masks/microbiology , Respiratory Protective Devices/microbiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Air Microbiology , Bacteria/isolation & purification , Equipment Design , Humans , Masks/supply & distribution , Materials Testing , Particulate Matter/isolation & purification , Respiratory Protective Devices/supply & distribution
5.
Sci Rep ; 10(1): 13875, 2020 08 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-720847

ABSTRACT

Respiratory protection is key in infection prevention of airborne diseases, as highlighted by the COVID-19 pandemic for instance. Conventional technologies have several drawbacks (i.e., cross-infection risk, filtration efficiency improvements limited by difficulty in breathing, and no safe reusability), which have yet to be addressed in a single device. Here, we report the development of a filter overcoming the major technical challenges of respiratory protective devices. Large-pore membranes, offering high breathability but low bacteria capture, were functionalized to have a uniform salt layer on the fibers. The salt-functionalized membranes achieved high filtration efficiency as opposed to the bare membrane, with differences of up to 48%, while maintaining high breathability (> 60% increase compared to commercial surgical masks even for the thickest salt filters tested). The salt-functionalized filters quickly killed Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria aerosols in vitro, with CFU reductions observed as early as within 5 min, and in vivo by causing structural damage due to salt recrystallization. The salt coatings retained the pathogen inactivation capability at harsh environmental conditions (37 °C and a relative humidity of 70%, 80% and 90%). Combination of these properties in one filter will lead to the production of an effective device, comprehensibly mitigating infection transmission globally.


Subject(s)
Air Filters/microbiology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/chemistry , Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Masks/microbiology , Membranes, Artificial , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Respiratory Protective Devices/microbiology , Sodium Chloride/chemistry , Aerosols , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/transmission , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Crystallization , Gram-Negative Bacteria/drug effects , Gram-Positive Bacteria/drug effects , Hot Temperature , Humans , Humidity , Pneumonia, Viral/transmission , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , SARS-CoV-2 , Sodium Chloride/pharmacology
6.
Am J Infect Control ; 48(9): 1037-1041, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-634244

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: One of the serious consequences of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic is the shortage of protective equipment for health personnel. N95 masks are considered one of the essential protective equipment in the management of patients with COVID-19. The shortage of N95 masks implies potential health risks for health personnel and significant economic losses for the health institution. The objective of this work was to investigate the disinfection of N95 masks artificially contaminated with SARS-CoV-2 and ESKAPE bacteria by using hydrogen peroxide plasma. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We examined the disinfection capacity of hydrogen peroxide plasma against the SARS-CoV-2 and 2 members of the ESKAPE bacteria (Acinetobacter baumannii and Staphylococcus aureus) through a study of artificial contamination in situ of N95 masks. Amplification of specific genes by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction of SARS-CoV-2 and microbiological culture of ESKAPE bacteria was performed before and after the disinfection process. RESULTS: SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in all assays using 5 different concentrations of the virus, and A baumannii and S aureus were not cultivable with inoculums of 102 to 106 CFU after disinfection tests of N95 masks with hydrogen peroxide plasma. CONCLUSION: Disinfection of N95 masks by using the hydrogen peroxide plasma technology can be an alternative for their reuse in a shortage situation. Implications for the use of disinfection technologies of N95 masks and the safety of health personnel are discussed.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents, Local/administration & dosage , Betacoronavirus/drug effects , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Disinfection/methods , Equipment Reuse , Hydrogen Peroxide/administration & dosage , Masks/microbiology , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Acinetobacter baumannii/drug effects , COVID-19 , Humans , Respiratory Protective Devices/microbiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL